Census: Urban Jacksonville In Decline


A look at the rise and fall of the Jacksonville Urban Core's population with the help of pre-consolidation city limit maps and 2010 census tract results.

Published March 5, 2014 in News - MetroJacksonville.com


feature

The original city limit boundaries of 1832 consisted of the Bay Street riverfront and the Cathedral District.

In 1842, the city's boundaries extended north along Hogans Creek and west to Clay Street.  The city would remain this size until the annexation of 1887.

1850 Census - 1,045

1860 Census - 2,118

1870 Census - 6,912

1880 Census - 7,650

A historic aerial of Pensacola

The 1880 Census would show that Jacksonville replaced Pensacola as Florida's largest city.

In 1887, several suburbs were annexed into Jacksonville.  They included LaVilla, Brooklyn, Riverside, Springfield, Durkeeville, East Jacksonville, Fairfield and Oakland.

1890 Census - 17,201

1900 Census - 28,429

1910 Census - 57,699

In 1919, the city expanded north to Long Branch Creek and Moncrief Park.  An expansion to the west also bought a portion of Avondale into the city limits.

1920 Census - 91,558

The annexation of 1925 would be Jacksonville's largest until consolidation.  Panama Park, Ortega, Moncrief Park and the city of Murray Hill were included in this expansion.

1930 Census - 129,549

There were several small scale expansions of the city limits during the 1930s.  These included annexations of the Ostrich farm property in 1931 and the city of South Jacksonville in 1932.  Jacksonville's land area would remain the same size until consolidation.

1940 Census - 173,065

Downtown Miami around the time the city became Florida's largest.

With 172,172 residents, the City of Miami was right on Jacksonville's heels in 1940.  By 1950, Miami became Florida's largest city with 249,276 residents.

1950 Census - 204,275

Downtown Tampa in 1960.

During this decade, the old city would peak and begin to decline in population.  In the middle of a boom, the city of Tampa would pass Jacksonville in population with 274,970 residents by 1960.  St. Petersburg, Tampa's neighbor across the bay, would come close with 181,298 residents.

1960 Census - 201,031

The declining city merged with Duval County in 1968, helping mask the problems of the decaying Inner City and regain the status of Florida's largest city.  Downtown's darkest days would occur in the decades to follow but high suburban growth rates would hide the urban core's rapid population loss.

1970 Census - 528,865

1980 Census - 540,920

1990 Census - 635,230

2000 Census - 735,503

2010 Census estimate - 821,784

While the official 2010 census records show Jacksonville with an impressive 11.7% growth rate, a look at census tract records reveal a completely different story.

Jacksonville's current inner city census tracts are nearly identical to the pre-consolidated city boundaries from the 1940 census.  


2010 Census City Population: 821,784

2010 Old City Census Tract Population: 104,047


2000 Census City Population: 735,503

2000 Old City Census Tract Population: 112,753

1950 Old City Population: 204,517

Net Urban Core Loss (1950 - 2000): -91,764

Net Urban Core Loss (1950 - 2010): -100,470


2010 Census City Population Density: 821,784 / 758.7 square miles = 1,083

2010 Old City Census Tract Density: 104,047 / 30.2 square miles = 3,445


2000 Census City Population Density: 735,503 / 758.7 square miles = 969

2000 Old City Census Tract Density: 112,753 / 30.2 square miles = 3,734

1950 Old City Population Density: 204,517 / 30.2 square miles = 6,772

Net Urban Core Loss (1950 - 2000): - 3,038 residents per mile

Net Urban Core Loss (1950 - 2010): - 3,327 residents per mile



2010 census tract results.  The old preconsolidated city limit boundaries are shown in red.




2010 census tract results. The old preconsolidated city limit boundaries are shown in red.

These numbers show that our urban core's population loss during the last decade was very similar to older industrial cities such as Cincinnati, Pittsburgh and Birmingham.  The associated census tract graphic (see above) indicates that the majority of early automobile oriented neighborhoods are also in decline.  These numbers also show that the Urban Core has the infrastructure in place to support twice as many residents than live there today.

As Jacksonville continues to deal with sprawl, congestion, limited road expansion funds and higher gas and energy costs, our focus on growth needs to shift back to the area that is already laid out to support higher densities.

Article by Ennis Davis

This article can be found at: http://www.metrojacksonville.com/article/2011-mar-census-2010-urban-jacksonville-in-decline


Metro Jacksonville

Copyright MetroJacksonville.com

Comments

The views expressed below are not those of News4Jax or its affiliated companies. By clicking on "Post," you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and your comment is in compliance with such terms. Readers, please help keep this discussion respectful and on topic by flagging comments that are offensive or inappropriate (hover over the commenter's name and you'll see the flag option appear on right side of that line). And remember, respect goes both ways: Tolerance of others' opinions is important in a free discourse. If you're easily offended by strong opinions, you might skip reading comments entirely.

blog comments powered by Disqus